TripleByte Review – What is Triple Byte?

TripleByte, hosted at, is a peculiar company that helps programmers find great companies to work at.

Allegedly offering their services free of charge, is a transparent organization that seeks to provide a valuable intermediary service between prospective software engineer applicants with top-rated engineering companies.

When investigating into the depths of TripleByte, we will be the first to say that we were surprised with their overall transparency as a company.

Providing sound business model insight while also reflecting verifiable user testimonials that passed our cross-referencing image test is a rare discovery in this day-and-age.

To learn more regarding the peculiar nature and advantages that can come from utilizing TripleByte we invite you to continue reading our unbiased review!

TripleByte Oversight

Business Model

TripleByte employs a straightforward service solely to software engineers looking to secure a full-time job.

Prospective engineer job applicants are able to use TripleByte services as a way to reduce the job hunting process while offering them with opportunities not often found elsewhere.

What Does TripleByte Offer?

TripleByte renders an assistive employment service for prospective software engineers seeking full-time work.

Consumers who work with TripleByte will undergo a technical interview process with you while also providing feedback on where they believe your strengths and weaknesses lie.

From there, TripleByte matches you with companies that are looking for people with your specific skill sets, where they can then fast track you through their hiring processes.

Why use TripleByte?

Saves You Time

It saves you time in the long-run.

While you make an initial time investment by going through the TripleByte interview process, afterwards you get fast tracked to final interviews with companies who have shown interest in you.

This fast tracking process can save you a few hours alone.

Selective Job Placement

Companies seek specific skill sets which varies widely in regards to what they are looking for in engineers.

While some companies may prefer academic programmers, other companies may feel that academic in a possible indication that you won’t be productive.

Regardless, Triple Byte claims to have mapped these varying differences and will identify companies where you’re a good fit.

More Opportunities

Stripe, Airbnb and Dropbox are among the chief companies most software engineers acquaint themselves with. However by using TripleByte you may gain more employment exposure and have options to consider other companies you may not have previously been familiar with.

TripleByte says that they can help quicken the application process by connecting your application with the right connections, such as hiring managers or founders.

Vouching for Technical Skills

The companies TripleByte works with trust their ability to find hidden talent that other recruiters may not find.

Who is Behind Triple Byte?

Triple Byte does not provide a corporate entity, or information relating to an overseeing entity.

According to their Terms and Conditions, TripleByte web site is governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, which likely indicates that their operation is based out of Delaware.

Apart from that information we were unable to connect any corporate entity to TripleByte which likely means that they are acting as their sole entity.

Due to the fact that TripleByte’s business model does not require any licensing for the services their rendered, we aren’t particularly troubled by the lack of ownership information.

Software engineers who are looking to get started with TripleByte can do so by visiting their site or by reaching out to them at

Domain Insight was a privately registered domain that was created on April 12th, 2015.

According to SimiliarWeb, TripleByte supports nearly an estimated total of 600,000 monthly visitors while reflecting a global rank of 76,921 with a US rank of 18,124 as of October 12th, 2018.

Community Feedback renders a rather select service so their volume of feedback appears rather bare.

According to GlassDoor, TripleByte reflects a few positive reviews that share strong pros and general cons.

“Shortens the interview process at some great companies.”

“Candidates don’t really get to pick the companies, or get the reasons why those companies were chosen.”

Reddit hosts an old thread relating to TripleByte, were most reviews either go on to say that TripleByte renders mediocre services while other share positive experiences.

Is a Scam?

TripleByte is not a scam.

Rendering a valuable intermediary service for prospective software engineers, TripleByte has assisted over a few thousand software engineers secure jobs.

If anything, we need more intermediary service platforms like TripleByte that provide a valuable service in a booming industry such as technology.

TripleByte Review Conclusion

Are you a software engineer who is experiencing difficulty with securing a competitive software engineering position?

Greatly reduce your interview times, have access to more career opportunities while also receiving great support along the way with TripleByte.

Having screened over 15,000 software engineers since their inception, is growing in popularity and will continue to serve as a dependable service provider for prospective software engineers to come.

We invite you to share your insight, opinions and experience by leaving your feedback below!


  1. Justy

    I do not code in Ruby and very little in SQL or Python. Nevertheless I was curious about the Machine Learning questions and browse through them. All high-school level. Any way, at the end of test I got two emails, none of which mentioning the results of my test, I was invited to recommend my friends etc.
    Triplebyte is wat it is and I don’t need it.

  2. K

    This is a follow up note to Tim. Consider if you will, a cynical theory about TripleByte. Suppose that all they really wanted to do was gather the email addresses of a desirable demographic. People who have, or have had, coding careers might tend to have some money. They also might tend to be the people who, as consumers, spend money on a lot of computer equipment and other electronics. They might have a BA or advanced degrees.
    So if you accept my premise about extreme dishonesty between what’s the main event and what is a mere formality (or core/periphery), TripleByte says “the quiz and the job placement is the main event! Asking you for your email address is a mere formality!” Now let’s just say “WHAT IF”, in order to exercise an abundance of caution. What if this is BS, and the main event is the email collection (and maybe the referrals) while all the fuss about the quiz, the detailed subject matter with example questions in Ruby and Python and the supposed connection with companies is the mere formality? The reason why they pour effort into subject matter is to gain the trust of the person giving them the email. The pipeline of emails is pure crack for marketers, who do not have to do any work isolating the demographically desirable people-involved-with-computers. Marketers pay TripleByte for their lists, and the big talk about the meritocratic process is fake. Isn’t this plausible?

  3. K

    I have two remarks which make me skeptical about the company. The first is that they try to get you to refer others and claim that if you refer someone who ends up getting a job, you will be awarded $3000. Yeah, maybe, but this could be a use of language that speaks in large sums of money, for the purpose of expectation setting or creating an ethos or a feeling. For example, remember The Ladders? It’s a scam, and they set up a feeling of being elite operators in an elite world of high salaries. It smacks of the Law of Attraction stuff, that you should hang around environments that are devoted to high salaries if you want to make one yourself. But the site proprietor may have no money and no connections, and could be skimming tiny bits, five dollars at a time or something, by setting up the expectation that hey, we are in the realm of the millions here. If you’re worrying about a fifteen or twenty dollar entrance fee, when everyone around you has gained the million dollar mindset, you are a small-minded, wonky person.
    That’s the flavor I’m talking about and I get a little of that from Triplebyte. “Why would anyone be concerned over pennies, when they are a brilliant engineer with high salaries just around the corner?”
    The second thing I didn’t like is that they don’t reveal exact scores on the quiz. I take exception with your calling them transparent. If they aren’t going to tell me whether I got 15/35, 30/35 or some other score, they can frame and contextualize my score in any way they like. They claimed I did exceptionally well, and I doubt I did that well. What is their incentive to do such a thing, when any amount of technical conversations, by phone, online mediums or whatever, would quickly reveal whether either side somehow didn’t know what they claimed to know?
    I don’t know what the incentive is, but reputable companies do not need to have referral systems on the side. Referrals suggests to me that there is a deliberate muddying of the difference between their core and their periphery. It’s actually similar to the thing about the million dollar ethos and the tiny piddling fee. If a company says “The million dollar ethos is what we really care about!! It’s the core! Oh yes, it’s true we want $5 from you but this is a mere periphery and insignificant,” I am inclined to think the opposite. Maybe they have set up their entity in order to accrue tiny bits over and over. Likewise, I have my doubts about whether Triplebyte is saying “The job placements is what we really care about!! It’s the core! Oh yes, it’s true we want to build traffic for ourselves on the side, but this is a mere periphery and insignificant.” It fits a pattern. Something smells about the self referentiality because games around building traffic are unrelated to whether or not that entity does a good job on the merits! It just has to do with building their presence. It’s like a bubble: stocks on the merits, or stocks just because of the greater fool theory? In case this comment is too long you can think of it just as a letter to the editor and you don’t need to run it as a comment. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *